Most discipleship programs fail in the same order, for the same reasons. This is the sequence that avoids it, written for a church that has nothing in place yet.
Before choosing a book or a night of the week, answer one question in writing: if this works, what is different about a person two years from now?
Vague answers produce vague programs. "Grow closer to God" cannot be led, taught or noticed. Something like "can read a passage and explain it to someone else, has told their story out loud, is serving in one place, and is meeting regularly with another believer" can be all four.
The most common failure is launching church-wide. A campaign commits you to a volume of leaders you do not have, a curriculum you have not tested, and a pace you cannot sustain past week six.
One group of six to twelve people, led by someone who is already discipling informally, teaches you more in a quarter than a launch teaches you in a year. It also fails cheaply, which matters, because your first attempt will need changing.
Curriculum is replaceable. Leaders are not. A mediocre study led by someone who follows up on a Tuesday will form people; an excellent study led by someone who does not will not.
Look for people who are already doing it without being asked. The person who takes new believers to coffee unprompted is your leader. The person who wants to teach is sometimes your leader and sometimes wants an audience, and the difference matters.
Content that requires a seminary degree to facilitate limits your program to people with one. Choose material where the leader's job is to ask the questions on the page and keep the room honest.
If you want a starting structure, our discipleship pathway lays out the sequence, and the playbook covers the first ninety days in detail.
Open-ended groups do not end. They fade, which is worse, because nobody gets to say it finished and nobody gets to decide whether to do it again.
A defined length, usually eight to sixteen weeks, does three useful things: it makes the ask small enough to say yes to, it gives you a natural point to change what did not work, and it lets people leave without leaving the church.
Attendance is the easiest number to collect and the least useful. Two better ones:
The window to recruit group two is while group one is still meeting and people can still feel what it was. Four weeks out, ask each person one question: who would you want to bring through this?
That question does two jobs at once. It finds your next participants, and the people with an immediate answer are usually your next leaders.
Expect a year before it feels like a program rather than a group, and two before it reproduces without you pushing. Anyone promising faster is selling something.
Then your first group is the leaders. Run it yourself with the four or five people most likely to lead next, and treat it as both discipleship and apprenticeship.
No. A church of fifty running one group needs a room and a leader. Software earns its place when you cannot personally remember where every person is, which for most churches is somewhere past three or four concurrent groups.
Start Discipling gives your leaders the courses, the reading plans and the week-by-week view of where each person actually is.
Get Started